You are here: 小蓝视频 Washington College of Law Impact Initiatives Programs Center Ati Country Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Center for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Tajikistan

Professor Mendez undertook a country visit to the Republic of Tajikistan from May 10-18 2012.聽 During his visit he met with Government officials, civil society members, and representatives of UN agencies and international organizations. He was also able to meet with victims and their families and visit several places of detention in and around Dushanbe, Khujand, Isfara, Istarafshan and Kurgan-Tube. The Special Rapporteur released his preliminary findings and a press release on May 18, 2012, and published his Country Visits Report on January 28, 2013.聽 The Special Rapporteur conducted a follow up visit to the Republic of Tajikistan on February 10-12, 2014.

FIELDWORK & ASSESSMENTS

During his first visit to Tajikistan, Professor Mendez welcomed the political will and significant efforts made by the Government of Tajikistan to revise legislation and launch capacity-building activities among law enforcement officials. Despite the introduction of a number of changes, however, numerous loopholes and inconsistencies in the Code of Criminal Procedure and in law enforcement practices persisted. On the basis of discussions held with public officials, judges, lawyers and representatives of civil society, interviews with victims and with persons deprived of their liberty, the former聽Special Rapporteur on Torture concluded that acts of torture for the purpose of extracting confessions are committed during arrest and while suspects are in police custody and under the jurisdiction of operative and investigating officers. Professor Mendez was also concerned that the Code of Criminal Procedure of Tajikistan does not contain an absolute prohibition of extradition or deportation in cases where the subject would be at risk of torture in accordance with the requirements of article 3 of the Convention against Torture.

After the follow up visit in 2014, Professor Mendez was pleased to find Tajikistan had made considerable efforts to improve the situation of torture and ill treatment and to implement his recommendations in a systematic and comprehensive way. However, he found that the majority of the recommendations issued in 2012 continue to apply today. While the he was encouraged by the adoption of new legislation that brings the definition of torture in line with the Convention and by the Supreme Court decree that guarantees the availability of safeguards to prevent torture from the time of arrest, he urged the Government to continue working to ensure that improved laws and policies result in concrete changes in practice. Furthermore, the punishment for torture and ill-treatment must be increased in accordance with the severity of these acts, and amnesty for these crimes must be specifically prohibited in the applicable legislation. The former Special Rapporteur also expressed serious concern about allegations of reprisals against detainees who had spoken or complained of torture and mistreatment in detention, as well as their families, lawyers, and journalists. He also noted that Tajikistan needed to increase its efforts to develop an effective and independent prevention apparatus, including ensuring independent oversight of its places of detention and access by local and international civil society groups, and recommended that Tajikistan ratify the OPCAT as a matter of priority and ensure the implementation of an NPM, as well as independent monitoring by civil society alongside the NPM.

CAPACITY BUILDING & PARTNERSHIPS

February 12, 2014: High-level roundtable聽

The roundtable brought together high-level members of the Government and local civil society for substantive talks on implementing the Special Rapporteur鈥檚 recommendations for combatting and preventing torture and ill-treatment on the ground. The even facilitated productive discussions between members of the national NGO Coalition Against Torture and high-level government officials, including the Minister of Justice, the Ombudsman, parliamentarians, and Ministry of Interior representatives.

RESOURCES