IP at the Supreme Court Series: Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith听
October 12, 2022听| 5:00 - 6:30pm EDT听
Moderated by听Professor Christine Farley
小蓝视频 Washington College of Law regularly invites counsel of record and counsel for selected amici to offer post-argument reflections in intellectual property (and related) cases heard by the Supreme Court. These events are held on the afternoon of oral argument before the Court.听
ISSUE
Issue(s): Whether a work of art is 鈥渢ransformative鈥 when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material (as the Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, and other courts of appeals have held), or whether a court is forbidden from considering the meaning of the accused work where it 鈥渞ecognizably deriv[es] from鈥 its source material (as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit has held).
PANELISTS
New York University School of Law
Brief of Art Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner
Latham & Watkins LLP,
Counsel for Petitioner, The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc.
Shades of Gray Law Group, P.C.
Brief of the Digital Media Licensing Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents
Peter A. Jaszi
Professor Emeritus
小蓝视频, Washington College of Law
Goodwin Procter LLP
Brief for The Robert Rauschenberg Foundation, Roy Lichtenstein Foundation, Joan Mitchell Foundation, Brooklyn Museum, and College Art Association as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner
Howard University School of Law,
Brief of Amici Curiae Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice and Intellectual-Property Professors in Support of Respondents
University of California, Berkeley, School of Law
Brief of Authors Alliance as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner
Kirkland & Ellis LLP,
Brief for Amicus Curiae Association of American Publishers in Support of Respondents
Harvard Law School,
Brief of Amici Curiae Copyright Law Professors in Support of Petitioner